In your next meeting, someone will sketch two boxes on a whiteboard, draw a line between them, and wait for you to choose. It looks decisive. Clean boundaries, clear outcomes. Reality never stays that simple.

Most workplace either/ors don’t hold up once the work starts. You pick Option A, then realize parts of Option B matter too. The market shifts. Customers surprise you. What began as opposites collapse into tools you use in rotation.

The pattern repeats:

• A founder can be authoritative about product vision while staying consultative about culture.
• A sales leader might chase volume in one quarter, then pivot toward quality when reputation is at risk.
• An operations team talks efficiency until a crisis forces redundancy.

None of this is indecision. It’s reading the room. It’s moving between stances without needing to declare loyalty to one forever.

The consultant’s two-by-two matrix is a good prop for a slide deck. But running a company is more like climbing: you don’t debate rope or compass, you carry both. The terrain decides what you use.

Switching tools isn’t comfortable. It takes more discipline than sticking with one default mode. You have to stay awake to context, resist the safety of consistency, and accept that good judgment often looks contradictory from the outside.

The next time someone frames a choice as A versus B, don’t bite. Ask instead: When would we need each? The shift feels small but opens space for better judgment.

Most lasting progress comes from mastering the “and,” not defending the “or.” Like a climber at altitude, you keep both rope and compass in reach — because no single tool saves you when the terrain keeps changing.

Like this? Subscribe via email here.