Why we keep showing up when things have stopped working.

The silence arrived before I understood what it meant. I asked a simple question and waited. Seven seconds passed. A microphone blinked, then went dark again. Someone typed a few words, erased them, and leaned back. The room felt thinner than it had the week before, as if the attention inside it had slipped out through a crack none of us had noticed.
In the early weeks that meeting had felt alive. People showed up ready. Laptops opened with purpose. Someone would lean forward to make a point, and the rest of the room followed. Blockers surfaced and decisions landed while the energy still held. The hour carried its own pulse, steady enough to rely on.
Over time the edges softened. A few cameras stayed dark. Updates drifted toward recitation. Slack messages arrived in place of voices. Nothing dramatic happened. The ground just lowered by an inch, then another. By the eighth week the meeting still appeared on everyone’s calendar, yet something essential had drained out of it. The form remained while the rhythm dissolved.
I felt the change in small ways. The pauses lengthened. Jokes that once worked landed with less warmth. People arrived on time but with a kind of distant presence, the way you might show up for a task already half convinced it has stopped mattering. No one declared the ritual finished. We all kept attending because ending it outright required admitting what had already occurred.
Teams often treat cadence as structure. A recurring slot on the calendar suggests accountability and continuity. You send the invites, reserve the room, follow the steps, and expect the pattern to carry the weight. Cadence delivers predictability, which has its place, but it does not create engagement on its own.
Rhythm depends on participation. It has to be renewed each time by the people in the room. Once that renewal slips, the pattern continues out of habit rather than purpose. I have seen teams hold daily standups that filled twelve rigid minutes without producing a single useful question. I have watched weekly reviews persist long after there was anything to review. These routines stayed alive because stopping them felt harder than continuing them, even when everyone quietly understood the work had migrated elsewhere.
The hollow patterns multiply. A triage call that once resolved real problems becomes a formality. A cross-functional sync repeats the same agenda because no one wants to rewrite it. The efficiency feels real because the motions are familiar. Underneath the surface, the work begins to drift.
Patterns endure when someone pays close attention. They look for early signs that the format no longer fits. They notice when the conversation tightens or when a topic that once moved easily now catches on hesitation. They adjust the shape before the gap turns into a quiet sinkhole that the rest of the team learns to step around.
I think of it the way you tend a small cooking fire. You clear the ash, turn a log, and adjust for the wind. Nothing about the work feels dramatic, yet neglect shows up fast. A fire fades slowly until the flame retreats to the center and smoke begins to rise in its place.
Our weekly sync had reached that smoky stage before we acted. The group was still meeting, but the work that mattered had already slipped to other channels. When we finally made changes, they were modest. We narrowed the guest list. We removed the slides that had become a shield rather than a tool. We replaced long updates with a straightforward question: what is in the way right now?
Small adjustments, but they reshaped the room. People leaned in again. The conversation returned to the present instead of drifting through a list of prepared lines. The rhythm resurfaced once the meeting matched the work instead of orbiting it.
Rituals behave like living patterns. They need tending. They change as teams change, and they can be redesigned when their purpose shifts. The hardest part is sensing when the beat has flattened, then having the nerve to tune it before the room grows quiet enough that no one remembers how it sounded before.
Related reading
Latest entries
Like this? Subscribe via email here.
